[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat Tıp Dergisi
2011, Cilt 16, Sayı 4, Sayfa(lar) 190-193
[ Turkish ] [ Tam Metin ] [ PDF ]
Primary Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection in Macular Eudema Due to Branched Retinal Vein Occlusion
Ahmet YALÇIN2, Yasin Yücel BUCAK1, Ahmet Şahap KÜKNER3, Didem SERİN4, Sedat ÖZMEN1
1Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Bolu, Türkiye
2Iğdır Devlet Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları Kliniği, Iğdır, Türkiye
3Özel Çağsu Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları Kliniği, Bolu, Türkiye
4Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları Kliniği, İstanbul, Türkiye

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of primary intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection in macular edema due to branched retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Materials and Methods: Twelve eyes of 12 patients with macular edema due to BRVO were included in the study. Macular edema, hemorrhage and decreased visual acuity due to BRVO were observed in all patients. Patients who have had not take any prior treatment because of BRVO were involved in the study.Fundus fluorecein angiography was taken before injection in all patients. Intravitreal injection of 1.25mg/0.05ml bevacizumab was performed in all patients. Visual acuity, fundus findings, and complications were recorded before and after injection.

Results: Eight patients were women and 4 patients were men. Mean age of the subjects was 59.5 years (22-76 years). Single IVB injection was performed in all patients. The time interval between the BRVO development and IVB injection was 23.9 days (5-75 days). Mean follow up was 134.5 days (16–570 days). Mean visual acuities were 0.9±0.4 and 0.3±0.3 LogMAR before injection and on the last follow up visit after injection, respectively (p<0.002). After primary IVB injection, decreased macular eudema and improved visual acuity were detected in all patients. Localized subconjonctival hemorrhages were observed in 3 patients. Serious complications which may deteriorate the vision were not developed in any patients.

Conclusion: Primary IVB injection in patients with macular eudema due to BRVO may be an effective and safe treatment option.


[ Turkish ] [ Tam Metin ] [ PDF ]
[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]