Currently the only curative treatment remains the allo-HCST for thalassemia major, and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) is higher in posttransplant outcomes
9. However, age at the transplant time, risk status of the disease, donor type, source of stem cells, and conditioning regimen are associated with the outcome in allo-HCST. Furthermore, high iron load increases the risk of posttransplant complications and affects the results of transplantation
10,11.
The age plays an important role in transplantation out-come. Better outcomes are achieved in younger patients compared to adult/elderly patients. In the Euro-pean Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry study which included a large number of patients, patients were categorized by age groups, and both OS and TFS were significantly better in patients younger than 14 years. OS was ⩾ 90% and EFS was ⩾ 83% in patients younger than 14 years, and thus the threshold age for optimal transplantation is considered 14 years 12. Pesaro group reported the results of allo-HSCT with RIC regimen in patients with a median age of 21 years (range, 17-31) and found that TFS and TRM were 67% and 27%, respectively 13. In our study group, all patients were older than 18 years and OS, TFS, and TRM were 66.6%, 33.3%, and 33.3%, respectively.
The disease risk score is also important for the out-comes with allo-HSCT. The poor risk factors include liver fibrosis, hepatomegaly (> 2 cm below the costal margin) and irregular chelation therapy. Based on these risk factors, patients are typically classified into 3 risk groups: class 1 with no risk factors; class 2 with 1 or 2 risk factors; and class 3 with all risk factors. Pesaro experience showed that the estimated TFS was 85% -90%, 80%, and 65% -70% in class 1, 2, and 3, respectively and TRM significantly increased from Pesaro class 1 to class 3 14,15. In our study, our patients had least 2 poor risk factors, including irregular chelation therapy and hepatomegaly and the rate of TRM was high.
Myeloablative conditioning regimen as combination of busulfan and cyclophosphamide is commonly used for allo-HSCT with HLA-matched related donor in patients with thalassemia. Busulfan is used to eradicate hyperplastic bone marrow, while cyclophosphamide is preferred for its immunosuppressive effect. This combination regimen is suitable for young and low-risk (class1-2) patients, however the liver toxicity of busul-fan and the cardiac side effects of cyclophosphamide are not suitable for adult patients and high-risk (class 3) patients 16. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is more common in class 3 patients associated with high iron load and busulfan increases the risk of SOS in this group. RIC regimen is usually preferred for adult patients and patients with high risk (class 3) 6,11. The addition of fludarabine and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) to busulfan and cyclophosphamide is a RIC regimen that is preferred in class 3 young patients. The OS is improved by RIC regimen, while the graft rejection risk is increased 17. Pesaro group added fludarabine, ATG, hydroxyurea and azathioprine to the combination of cyclophosphamide and busulfan for both increasing the immunosuppression effect and eradicating the thalassemic bone marrow. Thus, it was aimed to reduce the risk of graft rejection and toxicity. This regimen was administered to 33 patients with class 3 thalassemia younger than 17 years of age and they reported that OS rate was 93%, and the incidence of recurrent thalassemia decreased from 30% to 8% 18. Hussein et al. 19 presented a risk adopted allo-HSCT from matched related family donor in children. In this study, RIC with busulfan, fludarabine, total lymphoid irradiation and ATG was administered to patients with a Class 3 risk. They found that the 5-year OS and thalassemia-free-survival were 100% and 77%, respectively.
Allo-HSCT from MSD has favorable outcomes in younger patients with a lower risk of GVHD and it provides >90% OS, and >80% TFS. The survival out-comes (OS; ~70%, TFS; ~60-65%) of allo-HSCT from MSD are lower in adult patients compared to younger patients. The reason for this is that adults have more class 3 disease and iron-related organ damage is more common in adult patients 11,12. In our study, allo-HSCT from MSD was administered in 4 patients and TFS was 25% in this group.
The alternative donors such as unrelated donors are used in thalassemia when MSD is not available. GITMO group reported outcomes in 27 adult patients, who received HSCT from a MUD, and both OS and TFS were 70%. They reported that the incidence of grade II–IV aGvHD and cGvHD was 37% and 27%, respectively 20. In our study, allo-HSCT was obtained from MUD in 2 patients, and TFS was achieved in 1 patient, and neither GVHD nor TRM were observed in any patient.
The peripheral blood as stem cell source for allo-HSCT in thalassemia is not preferred because of increasing risk of acute and chronic GVHH. The transplantation with cord blood or bone marrow as stem cell source has excellent outcomes in thalassemia 11,21. Gha-vamzadeh et al. 22 compared the peripheral blood and bone marrow as stem cell in class I-II thalassemic children who underwent HLA-matched sibling donor. They reported that the incidence of chronic GVHD was more frequent in the peripheral blood group versus bone marrow group (48% versus 19%; P < .001) and there was no difference in the 2-year OS after transplantation with stem cell from peripheral blood and from bone marrow (83% and 89%, respectively). In our study we used the peripheral blood as stem cell source in all patients. Acute GvHD was detected in 2 patients who underwent allo-HSCT from MSD, including 1 mild cutaneous, 1 severe cutaneous, and 1 severe gastrointestinal acute GvHD. Chronic GvHD was detected in 1 patient as limited liver GvHD.
The limitation in our study was that we had a small number of patients, so no comparison can be made, especially between the donor types.