Materials and Methods: Spinal anesthesia was performed with the patients placed in the sitting position by injecting 1 mg kg-1 2 % lidocaine intrathecally through a 22 gauge needle inserted at the L3-4 interspace. Spinal anesthesia was performed with the patients 1 2 % lidocaineplaced in the sitting position by injecting 1 mg kg intrathecally through a 22 gauge needle inserted at the L3-4 interspace. The levels of block were assessed at 5th and 20th min after the spinal injection. Needle for pinprick, a piece of cotton for touch and ice in a finger of surgical glove for cold sensory were used.

Results: No significant difference was observed between the dermatomal level of loss of pinprick sense and the dermatomal level of loss of either touch sense or cold sense at 5th min. However at 20th min the dermatomal level of loss of touch sense was significantly lower than the dermatomal level of loss of pinprick and cold sensations (p<0.05).

Conclusion: It may be beneficial to use the non-invasive method touch stimulation instead of pinprick test for the assessment of block level at spinal anesthesia. ©2007, Firat University, Medical Faculty

We aimed to compare the dermatomal levels of sensory block determined by noninvasive simple tests touch and cold sense loss with routinely used invasive pinprick stimulation test in clinical practice.

All patients were premedicated with oral diazepam 5 mg and famotidine 20 mg, 2 h before their arrival in the operating room. Intraoperative monitoring include noninvasive arterial blood pressure and heart rate monitoring, electrocardiography, and pulse oximetry. After insertion of an intravenous cannula Lactated Ringer's solution administered at a rate of 10 mL kg^-1 h^-1 in all patients. The anticipated injection site and proceeding outward in a widening circle was sterilized with a povidoneiodine solution. Then, spinal anesthesia was performed with the patients placed in the sitting position by injecting 1 mg kg^-1 2 % lidocaine intrathecally through a 22 gauge needle inserted at the L3-4 interspace. The drug injection was performed without barbotman in 60 seconds. After injection of spinal solution the patients immediately were placed in the supine, and remained level for the duration of the study period.

The dermatomal levels of sensory block to pinprick (18- gauge needle), touch (a piece of cotton), and cold (ice in a finger of surgical glove) were assessed at 5th and 20th min after injection of the spinal anesthetic. The loss of each sensory modality was determined by the patient's verbal response to the stimulus applied midclavicular line starting caudal and moving cephalad, and in the order of cold, followed by touch, followed by pinprick. Sensory block data were recorded as the number of dermatomes cephalad to S-1 that were blocked (e.g. a dermatomal level of T-10 was considered to be 8 blocked dermatomes).

Statistical analysis:
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 10.0. Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.). Differential sensory nerve block was analysed with paired t test. A p< 0.05 was defined as significant.

Click Here to Zoom

Figure 1: The number of dermatomes blocked levels of three different tests at 5th and 20th minutes (mean±S.D.). *p<0.05 compared with pinprick and cold tests

Touch sensation mediated via A-β, pinprick sensation mediated via A-δ and cold sensation mediated via C fibers ¹. Lui et al ⁸ showed quantitively that touch, pinprick and cold sensations return correlated by A-β, A-δ and C fibers functional recovery.

Both surgical pain and touch sensation mediated by A-β fibers. The studies made by using transcutaneous electrical stimulation for monitoring anesthesia zone with regional anesthesia showed that, there is correlation between tolerance loss to electrical stimulus that is equal to the surgical incision and surgical anesthesia time and also A-β fiber functional recovery ^8,9. Rocco et al ⁷ monitored the sensorial blockage differential levels of pinprick, touch and cold sensations during whole spinal anesthesia in 50 patients to determine the variations of initial, plato and regression spread degrees. They showed that there were significant differences at pinprick, touch and cold sensation loss dermatomal levels and also touch sensation loss begin later and regress faster. Authors found the level of touch sensation as the sign of spinal anesthesia zone limits.

Hughes et al ⁶ found that gas jet delivered at room temperature compared favorably with ethyl chloride and pinprick, but not as well as with touch sensation. Another study with warm air sensation which was compared with cold sense from ethyl chloride spray showed that block level assessment results after spinal anesthesia was similar with both methods. This study showed that each method can be used interchangeably ¹⁰. Larson et al ¹¹ used pupillary responses to electrical stimulation for the assessment of sensory block level during combined epidural/general anesthesia. They administered noxious electrical stimulation to dermatomal levels and measured pupillary dilatation as response to stimulation (predicted block level). Then measured the actual block level with pinprick test. This study concluded that the level predicted by pupillary responses was within two dermatomal segments of the actual level in all the patients. Another study with different concentrations of lidocaine (1% or 2%) for the quantitative and selective assessment of sensory block level during lumbar epidural anesthesia showed that the dose of lidocaine affected intensity of sensory block. Cutaneous current perception device and also touch, cold and pinprick modalities were used to determine block level. Beyond the effect of lidocaine dose differential neural block levels were associated with differential effect on nerve fibers of different sizes ¹².

Russell ¹³ determined that there is a two segmental median difference between pinprick, touch and cold sensations differential blockage level, however cold and pinprick blockage level were 1-3 segment upper than touch block level. Our findings showed that pinprick, touch and cold sensation loss dermatomal level are different and also both pinprick and cold sensation loss dermatomal level is greater than the dermatomal levels of touch stimulation. These findins are harmonized with literature discussed above ^7,13.

The stimulus type applied to the unblocked skin, repetition, and the extension of application zone effect the sensorial level ¹. However in our study we used a narrow zone, avoid from repetition and sensorial test applied only at 5th and 20th min. So we thought that temporal and spatial summation minimised.

As a conclusion, it may be beneficial to use the noninvasive and painless method touch stimulation instead of pinprick test for the assessment of block level at spinal anesthesia.

1) Curatolo M, Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L. Sensory assessment analgesia in humans: A review of methods and applications. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 1517-1530.

2) Ikuta Y, Shimoda O, Ushijima K, Terasaki H. Skin vasomotor reflex as an objective indicator to assess level of regional anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 336-340.

3) Fassoulaki A, Sarantopoulos C, Zotou M, Karabinis G. Assessment of the level of sensory block after subarachnoid anesthesia using a pressure palpatori. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 398-401.

4) Shah J, Owen-Smith O, Coley S, Jeyapalan I, Atcheson R, May A. The pricking pain roller for assessment of sensory block after spinal anesthesia. Int Monit Reg Anaesth 1998; 10: 16.

5) Bourne TM, Campbell F, Mushambi MC, May AE. Patients' assessment of sensory levels during extradural anesthesia in labor. Int J Obstet Anaesth 1997; 6: 239-241.

6) Hughes JC, Harmer M: A new gas jet method for the assessment of sensory block after spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 197-200.

7) Rocco AG, Raymond SA, Murray E, Dhingra U, Freiberger D. Differential spread of blockade of touch, cold, and pinprick during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1985; 64: 917-923.

8) Lui S, Kopacz DJ, Carpenter RL. Quantitative assessment of differential sensory nevre block after lidocaine spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 60-63.

9) Sakura S, Sakaguchi Y, Shinzawa M, Hara K, Saito Y. The assessment of dermatomal level of surgical anesthesia after spinal tetracaine. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1406-1410.

10) Shah J, Ayorinde BT, Rowbotham DJ, Buggy DJ. Warm air sensation for assessment of block after spinal anesthesia. Br J Anesth 2000; 84: 399-400.

11) Larson MD, Sessler DI, Ozaki M, McGuire J, Schroeder M. Pupillary assessment of block level during combined epidural/general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1993; 79: 42-48.

12) Sakura S, Sumi M, Yamada Y, Kosaka YS. Quantitative and selective assessment of sensory block during lumbar epidural anaesthesia with 1% or 2% lidocaine. Br J Anesth 1998; 81: 718- 722.

13) Russell IF. A comparison of cold, pinprick and touch for assessing the level of spinal block at caesarean section. Intern J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13: 142-152.