Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Patient with Situs Inversus Totalis
1İstanbul Üniversitesi, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İSTANBUL, Türkiye
2İstanbul Üniversitesi, Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi, Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı, İSTANBUL, Türkiye
Keywords: Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic, situs inversus, Kolesistektomi, laparoskopik, situs inversus
5.231 görüntülenme 3.567 indirme
Introduction
Change in anatomical position of the organs influences the location of symptoms and signs arising from the diseased organ and imposes difficulties in the diagnosis and the surgical treatment of the medical condition5. Likewise, although the symptoms of cholelithiasis may be clear4, symptomatic gallstones in patients with situs inversus is a challenge for surgeons.
In the literature, there have been only 40 reports of open cholecystectomy and 20 reports of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with situs inversus6. We hereby aimed to present a new SIT patient with previous multiple operations to whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed due to symptomatic cholelithiasis.
Case Report
Figure 1: Plane chest X-ray demonsrates dextrocardia with an elevated left hemidiaphragm indicating the liver on the left side.
Figure 2: Preoperative abdominal computed tomography of the patient. Total situs inversus can easily be identified (gb: gall bladder).
The patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) under general anesthesia. The operating room and surgical team were set up as a mirror-image configuration of normal LC. We preferred French position. Open technique (Hasson's technique) was preferred as the patient had previous abdominal operations. This incision was made at the right lateral side of the umblicus. Pneumoperitoneum with CO2 was established with a pressure of 12 mmHg. A 30-degree viewing laparoscope was introduced via a 10-mm umbilical port. Visualization of the intraabdominal organs confirmed SIT. However, fibrinous adhesions between the small intestine and the left upper anterior abdominal wall were noted. Second 5 mm port was inserted in the left anterior axillary line and via this port adhesiolysis procedure was completed with a grasper and scissors. The other two ports were placed in this order; one 10-mm port in the midline in the sub-xiphoidal region and one 5-mm port (working port of the surgeon) in the left midclavicular line at the left paraumbilical level. The port sides are shown in Figure 3. On laparoscopic examination, intrahepatic localization of the gall bladder was detected. It was fibrotic and adherent to the omentum due to the previous attacks of cholecystitis. As the hilus of the gallbladder could not be visualized clearly due to fibrosis, retrograde cholecystectomy procedure was performed. The fundus of the gallbladder was grasped and retracted with a clinch through the 5-mm port in the left anterior axillary line. Traction of the Hartmann's pouch was carried out by the surgeon's left hand using a grasper inserted through the 10-mm port in the sub-xiphoidal region. Dissection of the Calot's triangle was performed with electrocautery. Next, the cystic duct and artery were identified and clipped in a usual fashion. The gallbladder was dissected from the liver bed and removed through the umbilical port. A drain was placed in the subhepatic region. The remaining part of the operation concluded uneventfully. The operative time was 100 minutes. The patient was discharged on the postoperative day 1. Pathologic examination of the specimen revealed chronic cholecystitis with cholelithiasis. No complication has emerged during a 1 year follow-up period.
Figure 3: Trocar sides of the patient are shown. Arrows indicate the midline incision scar due to the previous abdominal operations.
Discussion
SIT does not increase the incidence of gallbladder disease. However, physical examination of a patient with situs inversus can be misleading and cause clinical confusion. The presentation with left upper quadrant pain may delay the diagnosis of gallstones. Although most patients present with pain on the left side due to the peritoneal irritation, ten percent of patients with cholelithiasis on the left side present with right-sided abdominal pain. Thirty percent of such patients have epigastric pain9. Because the central nervous system may not share the general transposition, pain can be felt in such different places10. So, in patients with situs inversus to whom LC is planned, complete assessment of the patient is mandatory in order to avoid potential complications6.
In a literature review by Machado et al, 32 patients with SIT have been operated on laparoscopically due to gallbladder disease. Among them, 6 patients had acute cholecystitis, 3 had biliary colics, 1 had empyema, 3 had cholangitis, and 19 had chronic cholecystitis. Previous abdominal operation had been performed in only one patient11. In our case, the patient past-medical history also revealed previous multiple abdominal operations. So far, including our patient, a total number of only 2 SIT cases who had had previous abdominal operations have undergone LC. In another report, laparoscopic appendicectomy was also carried out in addition to cholecystectomy12.
We performed fundohilar dissection of the gallbladder. Although, in this case, retrograde dissection was necessitated due to inadequate visualization of the hilus of the gallbladder in intrahepatic localization, some reports advocate antegrade dissection as it provides better visualization of the anatomical structures13,14.
In summary, the value of laparoscopy in evaluation of patients with atypical abdominal pain has been well established and LC is the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic approach should be the same for patients with SIT and this is supported by previous reports in the literature. This procedure in patients with SIT is, however, more difficult than usual due to the mirror-image anatomy especially for a right-handed surgeon. With modifications in the surgical team and equipment, the operation can be performed safely by a surgeon experienced in laparoscopy.
References
1)Mayo CW, Rice RG. Situs inversus totalis. AMA Arch Surg. 1949;58:724-730.
2)McKay D, Blake G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis: a case report. BMC Surg. 2005;17;5:5.
3)Yaghan RJ, Gharaibeh KI, Hammori S. Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11:233-237.
4)Puglisi F, Troilo VL, De Fazio M, et al. Cholecystectomy in situs viscerum inversus totalis. Does laparoscopy increase the pitalls? Chir Ital. 2006;58:179-183.
5)Banerjee Jesudason SR, Vyas FL, Jesudason MR, Govil S, Muthusami JC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with situs inversus. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004;23:79-80.
6)Kumar S, Fusai G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis with left-sided gall bladder. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89:W1:6-8.
7)Sato S, Watanabe M, Nagasawa S, et al. Laparoscopic observations of congenital anomalies of the liver. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:136-140.
8)Goh P, Tekant T, Shang NS, Ngoi SS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with empyema of the gallbladder and situs inversus. Endoscopy. 1992;24:799-800.
9)Takei HT, Maxwell JG, Clancy TV, Tinsley EA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in situs inversus totalis. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1992;2:171-176.
10)Aydin U, Unalp O, Yazici P, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;21;12:7717-7719.
11)Machado NO, Chopra P. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with situs inversus totalis: feasibility and technical difficulties. JSLS. 2006;10:386-391.
12)Djohan RS, Rodriguez HE, Wiesman IM, Unti JA, Podbielski FJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy in situs inversus totalis. JSLS. 2000;4:251-254.
13)Carbajo MA, Martín del Omo JC, Blanco JI, et al. Congenital malformations of the gallbladder and cystic duct diagnosed by laparoscopy: high surgical risk. JSLS. 1999;3:319-321.
14)Gui D, Magalini S, Prete F, Sermoneta D. What's right when the gallbladder's left? A case report. Surg Endosc. 2002;16: 1637.
© 2010 Fırat Tıp Dergisi. Tüm hakları saklıdır.

