Miadında Canlı Doğan Parapagus Dicephalus Yapışık İkiz: Olgu Sunumu
1Ozalp State Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Van, Turkey
2Van Obstetrics and Children's Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Van, Turkey
Anahtar Kelimeler: Conjoined twin, Parapagus dicephalus, Prenatal screening, Yapışık ikizler, Parapagus dicephalus, Prenatal tarama
6.730 görüntülenme 3.483 indirme
Introduction
Case Report
During first evaluation, both of newborns were active and crying. There were two heads, three upper limbs and three lower limbs. The twins could move right and left side limbs and the medial arm and foot appeared to be non-functional. The external genitalia was not clearly identical (Figure 1, 2). X-ray images revealed that there was one heart and fused lungs (Figure 3, X-ray). After initial evaluation, the patient was transferred to a multidisciplinary hospital. According to information received from the hospital, the twins could be feeding with nasogastric catheter. Surgery for separation was excluded because of visceral anatomy.
Figure 1: Conjoined twins after delivery
Figure 2: Conjoined twins with one anal canal and ambigius genitalia
Figure 3: X-ray image of conjoined twins with enlarged single heart
Discussion
CTs are classified according to side of union and can be a major prognostic factor. Ventral unions (87%), which can occur rostrally (48%), laterally (28%) and caudally (11%), are the most frequent form. Dorsal unions (13%) are rare3,11. Depending on the severity of visceral malformation, survival of CTs is extremely low4,12. With the wide spread use of prenatal screening these anomalies can be detected before viability.
First trimester ultrasound screening is useful for early diagnosis of CTs. In our case, the patient did not have prenatal follow up. If two fetuses cannot be visualized clearly, conjoined twinning must be suspected. Umbilical cord anomalies, fetal motion abnormalities and increased nuchal translucency are ultrasound findings which could be helpful in the diagnosis of CTs13-15. Polyhydramnios is seen in 50 to 76 % of cases. Pregnant women are recommended to have at least one ultrasound examination during pregnancy.
Depending on the severity of visceral anomalies, most CT pregnancies do not reachterm. Although vaginal deliveries have been reported at term, cesarean section is the preferred for prevent fetal and maternal complications16-18.
After birth of live CTs, the most challenging period for the physicians starts. Most CTs live for minutes or hours. The fetal outcomes depend on visceral organs status. Fetal visceral anomalies can occur in many types. Immediate separation is a plausible option if appropriate resources are available. In our case, the twins were doing extremely well during the early postpartum period so the decision was made not to immediately separate them. In most parapagus twins, visceral organs can be shared with twins after thorough preoperative evaluation.
Cardiovascular anomalies are the most severe and life-threatening anomalies that CTs encounter. The type and severity of heart anomalies depends on the side of union. The reason for death is cardio-pulmonary insufficiency in most cases. Complex congenital heart disease, transposition of the great vessels, atrioventricular septal defects are the most common anomalies in dicephalus parapagus twins19. Gastrointestinal system anomalies are another prognostic factor. Since there was no information regarding the gastrointestinal tract, the patient had an orogastric catheter placed for feeding. After insertion of catheters, x-ray images were used to confirm correct placement. X-ray images revealed that the catheters were located in two individual stomachs (Figure 4). One patent anus was identified. The digestive systems therefore united after the stomach but the precise segment of union was not clear. These types of visceral organ sharing are the limiting factor of surgical repair.
Figure 4: X-ray image after placement of orogastric catheters
In most parapagus twins, there is a single but shared genitourinary tract3. Conjoined twinning is more common in the female gender, and nearly 70% of all CTs are female20,21. In our case, we could not clearly identify the gender.
Most CTs pregnancies do not result in live births, however viable CTs are possible if they are followed closely during the prenatal period. Management of living CTs is a complex issue for health professionals and the patient's families. Perinatal and ethical outcomes must be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting. Early diagnosis of this anomaly is the main stay for prevention. Prenatal screening tests and routine ultrasound are recommended for all pregnant women.
References
1)Hanson JW. Incidence of conjoined twinning. Lancet 1975; 2: 1257.
2)Edmonds LD, Layde PM. Conjoined twins in the United States 1970-7. Teratology 1982; 25: 301-8.
3)Spencer R. Theoretical and analytical embryology of conjoined twins: part I: embryogenesis. Clin Anat 2000; 13: 36-53.
4)Machin GA, Keith LG, Bamforth F. An atlas of multiple pregnancy: biology and pathology. CRC Press, Parthenon Publishers, New York 1999.
5)Taruffi C. Storia della teratologica, vol. 2. Bologna: Regia Tipografia 1882; 572-8.
6)Levin M, Roberts DJ, Holmes LB, Tabin C. Laterality defects in conjoined twins. Nature 1996; 384: 321.
7)Crane JP. Sonographic evaluation of multiple pregnancy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1984; 5: 144.
8)Spencer R. Minimally united ischiopagus twins: infraumbilical union with cloacal anomalies. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 1538-45.
9)Charles A, Dickinson JE, Watson S, Phillips N, Yovich J. Diamniotic conjoined fetuses in a triplet pregnancy: An insight in to embryonic topology. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2005; 8: 666-72.
10)Kapur RP, Jack RM, Siebert JR. Diamniotic placentation associated with omphalopagus conjoined twins: Implications for a contemporary model of conjoined twinning. Am J Med Genet 1994; 52: 188-95.
11)Spencer R. Anatomic description of conjoined twins: a plea for standardized terminology. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31: 941-4.
12)Mackenzie TC, Crombleholme TM, Johnson MP, et al. The natural history of prenatally diagnosed conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 303-9.
13)Van den Brand SF, Nijhuis JG, van Dongen PW. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of conjoined twins. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994; 49: 656-62.
14)Sebire NJ, Souka A, Skentou H, Geerts L, Nicolaides KH. First trimester diagnosis of monoamniotic twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 223-5.
15)Pajkrt E, Jauniaux E. First-trimester diagnosis of conjoined twins. Prenat Diagn 2005; 25: 820-6.
16)Agarwal U, Dahiya P, Khosla A. Vaginal birth of conjoined thoracopagus- a rare event. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2003; 269: 66-77.
17)Creinin M. Conjoined twins. In: multiple pregnancies: Epidemiology, gestation and perinatal outcome. LG Keith, E Papiernik, DM Keith & B Luke (Editors). Parthenon, New York, 1995; 93-112.
18)Harman M. Vaginal delivery of dicephalic parapagus conjoined twins: Case report and literature review. Tohoku J Exp Med 2005; 205: 179-85.
19)Gilbert-Barness E, Debich-Spicer D, Opitz JM. Conjoined twins: Morphogenesis of the heart and a review. Am J Med Genet A 2003; 120: 568-82.
20)Wedberg R, Kaplan C, Leopold G, et al. Cephalothoracopagus (Janiceps) twinning. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 54: 392-6.
21)Turgut F, Turgut M, Basaloglu H, Basaloglu HK, Haberal A. Extremely rare type of conjoined twins: Cephalothoracopagus deradelphus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 80: 191-4.
© 2013 Fırat Tıp Dergisi. Tüm hakları saklıdır.

