Material and Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 43 patients who underwent arthroscopic medial meniscus repair between January 2017 and January 2021, with a minimum follow-up period of one year. Patients were identified through hospital registries and archive records. Preoperative and final postoperative clinical assessments were performed, including evaluation of functional outcomes. Participants were stratified into two groups: those who underwent meniscal repair with MCL pie-crusting (n = 21) and those who underwent repair without pie-crusting (n = 22).

Results: Comparative analysis of operative duration, time to return to sports, and functional outcomes measured by Lysholm and Cincinnati knee scores revealed no statistically significant differences between the two cohorts. Operative time showed no significant variance (p = 0.318). Similarly, postoperative Lysholm (p = 0.784) and Cincinnati (p = 0.511) scores did not differ significantly between groups. Both cohorts demonstrated significant postoperative improvement relative to baseline functional scores.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that the application of the MCL pie-crusting technique during arthroscopic medial meniscus repair does not significantly impact operative time or postoperative functional outcomes compared to standard repair methods. However, the pie-crusting technique facilitates enhanced visualization of the medial joint compartment, potentially reducing iatrogenic cartilage injury risk. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required to substantiate these findings and optimize surgical protocols for medial meniscus repair.

Moran et al. ⁵ reported favorable outcomes in patients who underwent the MCL pie-crusting technique, demonstrating significant improvements in Lysholm scores, Tegner Activity Scale, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores at the final postoperative follow-up, compared to preoperative evaluations. Similarly, Claret et al. ⁶ observed higher Lysholm scores at two months postoperatively in patients treated with percutaneous MCL pie-crusting compared to those without the technique. In a retrospective study, Herber et al. ⁷ evaluated clinical and radiological outcomes of MCL pie-crusting during isolated medial meniscal root repair. Their findings indicated a lower rate of recurrent tears at six months in patients treated with the pie-crusting technique, without evidence of medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the MCL pie-crusting technique on knee stability and functional outcomes during arthroscopic medial meniscal repair in patients with narrow medial joint spaces and limited access to the medial meniscus, particularly in cases involving posterior horn tears.

Exclusion criteria included patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, isolated lateral meniscal tears, combined medial and lateral meniscal or cruciate ligament tears, cases treated with meniscectomy, patients lost to follow-up, and those who underwent further surgery on the same knee. Of 203 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery, 48 met the inclusion criteria as having isolated medial meniscal tears without additional pathology. Five of these were excluded due to loss to follow-up, leaving 43 patients for analysis. Of these, 21 underwent intraoperative MCL pie-crusting surgery technique, while 22 underwent standard repair without it.

Postoperatively, all patients began quadriceps strengthening and active/passive knee motion exercises. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 15 days, 1 month, 45 days, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Patients were advised to avoid full weight-bearing for one month and use crutches. Physical therapy was initiated for patients with restricted range of motion during follow-up.

Patient data were retrieved from hospital records and files. Current clinical status was assessed through physical examination, and Lysholm and Cincinnati scores were recorded both preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Postoperative evaluations included physical exams and routine radiographs.

The Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale are widely used to assess outcomes after arthroscopic knee surgery. These subjective tools evaluate function and activity limitations and are valuable for monitoring treatment efficacy ⁸. The Cincinnati Knee Scoring Form assesses occupational and sports-related function, symptoms, and daily activity limitations ⁹.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.0 package program. Categorical variables were summarised as frequencies and percentages, while continuous variables were summarised as means and standard deviations (or medians and minimum-maximum values when appropriate). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was employed to ascertain whether the continuous measurements were consistent with the assumption of normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney U test was employed to evaluate the numerical measurements that did not demonstrate a normal distribution between the two groups. All tests were conducted with a statistical significance level of 0.05.

Ethical Approval
Approval for the research project was granted by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee on 01/07/2021, with the decision number 2792. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their inclusion in the study.

The mean surgical duration was 60 minutes (range: 45-75) in the pie-crusting group and 58 minutes (range: 47-74) in the non-pie-crusting group, showing no significant difference (p =0.318). Pain was the most common symptom (100%), followed by knee locking (45%) and swelling (3%).

At six weeks postoperatively, 51% of patients in both groups were asymptomatic, while the rest reported pain during daily activities. No valgus instability was noted at any follow-up, despite initial joint space opening during pie-crusting. Tenderness in the medial knee was seen in 12 patients at two weeks, which resolved entirely by week six.

In the first postoperative year, 74% of patients in each group were asymptomatic. Mild exercise-related pain was reported by 8 patients (19%), and knee locking recurred in 3 patients (7%).

The mean Lysholm score improved significantly from 74 to 94 postoperatively (p < 0.001) in the whole cohort. In the pie-crusting group, the score increased from 76 to 94, and in the non-pie-crusting group, from 72 to 94. The between-group difference was not significant (p =0.236) (Table 1, 2).

Click Here to Zoom

Table 1: Preoperative and final follow-up lysholm scores in patients undergoing medial meniscus repair with the pie-crusting technique.

Click Here to Zoom

Table 2: Preoperative and final follow-up lysholm scores in patients undergoing medial meniscus repair without pie-crusting technique.

Similarly, the Cincinnati knee scores improved significantly in both groups (p <0.001). In the pie-crusting group, the score increased from 17.1 to 24.3; in the non-pie-crusting group, from 17.3 to 24.4. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p =0.511) (Table 3, 4).

Click Here to Zoom

Table 3: Preoperative and final follow-up cincinnati scores of patients undergoing medial meniscus repair using the pie-crusting technique.

Click Here to Zoom

Table 4: Preoperative and final follow-up cincinnati scores of patients undergoing medial meniscus repair without the use of the pie-crusting technique.

Range of Motion (ROM): At the fourth-week follow-up, joint motion limitation was observed in 11 patients-6 who underwent medial meniscal repair with pie-crusting and 5 without. All were referred to physical therapy following early detection at initial outpatient visits. At final follow-up, no ROM deficits were noted in any of these patients.

Thigh Atrophy: Thigh circumference was measured bilaterally at final follow-up. Among patients who underwent repair with the pie crusting technique, thigh atrophy was <1 cm in 15 patients, 1-2 cm in 5, and >2 cm in 1. In the non-pie-crusting group, 17 had <1 cm atrophy, 3 had 1-2 cm, and 2 had >2 cm (Table 5).

Click Here to Zoom

Table 5: Femoral atrophy results of our patients.

Mean thigh atrophy was 8.3 mm in the pie-crusting group and 8.2 mm in the non-pie-crusting group. The difference was not statistically significant (p =0.346).

Bellemans et al. ¹² reported an average medial joint space increase of 2.4 mm using needle pie-crusting of the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Similarly, Ming Lei and Chiang Hua ¹³ evaluated 61 patients, comparing those with and without MCL release via pie-crusting. Both groups showed improved Lysholm scores at three months postoperatively. MCL injuries were mostly mild (Grade 0-I), with no Grade III injuries, and no significant difference in MCL status was observed at one month. The authors concluded that pie-crusting facilitates surgery by increasing operative speed, reducing time, and preventing cartilage damage. Our study found no significant difference in operative times between groups.

Choi et al. ¹⁴ routinely applied pie-crusting regardless of medial compartment tightness, observing no saphenous nerve or vascular injury. All patients exhibited Grade I MCL laxity, which resolved by three months. Functional outcomes and pain scores were comparable between groups. Advantages included ease of learning, fewer required instruments, reduced operative time, and decreased risk of cartilage injury, while potential drawbacks involved the risk of full-thickness MCL rupture and unpredictable medial compartment expansion.

In a retrospective study by Arıcan et al. involving 86 patients, the use of the pie-crusting technique was compared in patients with a medial joint space less than 5 mm. Clinical (Kujala, IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner scores) and radiological (medial joint space, valgus laxity) evaluations showed a significant increase in medial joint space at 1 and 6 months postoperatively (p <0.05), while no significant difference was found at 12 months (p >0.05). Valgus laxity angle and clinical scores improved significantly in both groups, with no difference between them. These results indicate that the PC technique safely improves medial joint visualization without causing persistent valgus laxity ¹⁵.

Previous studies have documented transient MCL partial tears post-pie-crusting, with medial joint space increases diminishing from 2 mm at one week to 0.1 mm at three months ¹¹. Immediate postoperative medial opening was under 5 mm at 20° flexion, resolving by six weeks without medial instability ¹¹.

Our findings align with these results, demonstrating a statistically significant medial joint space increase following MCL release with pie-crusting. No saphenous nerve injury or full-thickness MCL rupture occurred. Patients showed complete resolution of medial knee tenderness and no medial instability during follow-up. No iatrogenic cartilage damage was observed in either group. Both groups exhibited significant postoperative improvements in Lysholm and Cincinnati scores compared to baseline.

1) Roos H, Laurén M, Adalberth T, Roos EM, Jonsson K, Lohmander LS. Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41: 687-93.

2) Englund M, Lohmander L. Risk factors for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis fifteen to twenty-two years after meniscectomy. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 2811-9.

3) Fithian DC, Kelly MA, Mow VC. Material properties and structure-function relationships in the menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 252: 19-31.

4) Lee DH, Lee BS, Kim JM et al. Predictors of degenerative medial meniscus extrusion: radial component and knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19: 222-9.

5) Moran TE, Awowale JT, Werner BC, Fox MA, Miller MD. Associated morbidity after the percutaneous release of the medial collateral ligament for knee arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2020; 36: 891-900.

6) Claret G, Montañana J, Rios J et al. The effect of percutaneous release of the medial collateral ligament in arthroscopic medial meniscectomy on functional outcome. Knee 2016; 23: 251-5.

7) Herber AP, Brinkman JC, Tummala SV, Economopoulos KJ. Medial collateral ligament pie-crusting for isolated medial meniscal root repair is associated with improved clinical outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2024; 40: 869-75.

8) Briggs KK, Steadman JR, Hay CJ, Hines SL. Lysholm score and Tegner activity level in individuals with normal knees. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37: 898-901.

9) Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 402-16.

10) Flynn JM, Surgeons AAoO. Orthopaedic knowledge update 10. 2011.

11) Han X, Wang P, Yu J, Wang X, Tan H. Arthroscopic pie-crusting release of the posteromedial complex of the knee for surgical treatment of medial meniscus injury. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2020; 21: 1-9.

12) Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Van Lauwe J, Victor J. A new surgical technique for medial collateral ligament balancing: multiple needle puncturing. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 1151-6.

13) Lei M-M, Hua Q. Application of pie-crusting technique of deep medial collateral ligament under arthroscopy in repairing posterior horn of medial meniscus tears. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2021; 34: 840-6.

14) Choi KY, Koh IJ, Kim MS, In Y. Medial meniscal ramp lesion repair through anterior portals using a medial collateral ligament pie-crusting technique. Arthroscopy Techniq 2021; 10: 1073-7.

15) Arıcan G, Ercan N, Atmaca E, İltar S, Alemdaroğlu KB. During arthroscopic repair of medial meniscal tears: do not be afraid to perform "Pie-crust" technique. J Knee Surg 2023; 36: 139-45.